10 Extinct Animals That Could Return Through Science 🧬🦣
Extinction used to be forever. But not anymore. Scientists are using DNA, cloning, and genetic engineering to resurrect extinct species. Is it ethical? Is it possible? Is it safe?
Did you know that mammoth embryos already exist in laboratories? Or that the last Tasmanian tiger was filmed in 1933 and could return by 2025? De-extinction is no longer science fiction.
1. Woolly Mammoth 🦣
Ice Age Icon
Extinction: 4,000 years ago
Cause: Climate change + hunting
Progress:
- Complete DNA sequenced
- Hybrid embryos created
- Colossal Biosciences investing $15 million
Method:
- Edit Asian elephant DNA
- Insert mammoth genes
- Create cold-resistant hybrid
Prediction: 2028-2030
Goal:
Restore Arctic ecosystem (tundra).
2. Tasmanian Tiger (Thylacine) 🐅
Last Seen in 1936
Extinction: 1936
Cause: Hunting + habitat loss
Progress:
- Well-preserved DNA
- Complete genome mapped
- Active project in Australia
Method:
- Cloning using close marsupial relative
- CRISPR genetic editing
Prediction: 2025-2027
Challenge:
Marsupial (different gestation).
3. Passenger Pigeon 🕊️
Billions Became Zero
Extinction: 1914 (last one died in a zoo)
Cause: Mass hunting
Population:
3-5 billion → 0 in 50 years.
Progress:
- DNA from museum specimens
- Living close relative (band-tailed pigeon)
Method:
Edit relative's DNA to recreate characteristics.
Prediction: 2030+
4. Quagga 🦓
Half-Striped Zebra
Extinction: 1883
Cause: Hunting
Progress:
- Quagga Project (South Africa)
- Selective zebra breeding
- Similar animals already born
Method:
Artificial selection (not cloning).
Prediction: Already underway
Success:
Current animals are 90% quagga.
5. Aurochs 🐂
Ancestor of Cattle
Extinction: 1627
Cause: Hunting + habitat loss
Progress:
- TaurOs Project (Europe)
- Crossing primitive breeds
- Similar animals already exist
Method:
Back-breeding modern cattle.
Prediction: 2025 (nearly complete)
Goal:
Restore European grasslands.
6. Moa 🦤
Giant Bird of New Zealand
Extinction: 1400
Cause: Hunting by Maori
Size:
Up to 3.6m tall, 250kg.
Progress:
- DNA preserved in bones
- Close relative: kiwi
Challenge:
Large genetic difference.
Prediction: 2035+ (difficult)
7. Woolly Rhinoceros 🦏
Mammoth's Cousin
Extinction: 10,000 years ago
Cause: Climate change
Progress:
- Well-preserved DNA in permafrost
- Close relative: Sumatran rhinoceros
Method:
Similar to mammoth.
Prediction: 2030-2035
Challenge:
Modern rhino critically endangered.
8. Dodo 🦤
Symbol of Extinction
Extinction: 1662
Cause: Hunting + invasive species
Progress:
- Partial DNA recovered
- Close relative: Nicobar pigeon
Challenge:
Degraded DNA (tropical climate).
Prediction: 2040+ (very difficult)
Icon:
More symbolic than practical.
9. Saber-Toothed Tiger 🐯
Prehistoric Predator
Extinction: 10,000 years ago
Cause: Climate change + prey extinction
Progress:
- Ancient DNA difficult to recover
- Close relative: modern cats
Challenge:
Very degraded DNA.
Prediction: 2050+ (unlikely)
Problem:
Where would you put a 300kg predator?
10. Giant Ground Sloth 🦥
American Megafauna
Extinction: 10,000 years ago
Cause: Hunting + climate change
Size:
6m tall, 4 tons.
Progress:
- DNA in fossilized feces
- Close relative: modern sloth
Method:
Genetic editing.
Prediction: 2035+
How Does De-Extinction Work? 🔬
Main Methods
1. Cloning:
- Extract DNA from fossil
- Insert into egg of close species
- Implant in surrogate mother
2. Genetic Editing (CRISPR):
- Edit living species' DNA
- Insert extinct species' genes
- Create hybrid
3. Back-Breeding:
- Cross animals with ancestral traits
- Select over generations
4. Tissue Cloning:
- Create cells from DNA
- Develop in laboratory
Challenges 🚧
Technical Obstacles
1. Degraded DNA:
Maximum: 1 million years (usually much less).
2. Surrogate Mother:
Needs close living species.
3. Genetic Diversity:
One individual doesn't make a population.
4. Behavior:
Who teaches an extinct animal to survive?
5. Habitat:
Where to put them? Ecosystem has changed.
6. Cost:
Millions per animal.
Ethical Questions ⚖️
Should We Do This?
Arguments For:
- Correct human error
- Restore ecosystems
- Scientific advancement
- Biodiversity
Arguments Against:
- Resources better used on living species
- Animals will suffer (no habitat)
- Ecological risks
- "Playing God"
Consensus:
Focus on species recently extinct due to humans.
Partial Successes ✅
It's Already Happened
Pyrenean Ibex (Bucardo):
- Extinct in 2000
- Cloned in 2003
- Lived 7 minutes (lung problems)
- First de-extinction (temporary)
Przewalski's Horse:
- Nearly extinct
- Resurrected from 12 individuals
- Current population: 2,000+
California Condor:
- 27 individuals in 1987
- Breeding program
- Today: 500+
Future of De-Extinction 🔮
What's Coming
2025-2030:
- First hybrid mammoths
- Resurrected Tasmanian tiger
- Complete aurochs
2030-2040:
- More megafauna species
- Conservation parks
- De-extinction tourism
2040+:
- Dinosaurs? (unlikely - DNA too old)
- Neanderthals? (ethical?)
Alternative: Save the Living 🌍
Priorities
Critically Endangered Species:
- Javan rhinoceros: 76 individuals
- Vaquita: 10 individuals
- Amur leopard: 100 individuals
Argument:
Better to prevent extinction than reverse it.
Solution:
Do both - save the living AND resurrect the extinct.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) ❓
1. Can we really bring back dinosaurs like in Jurassic Park?
No. DNA completely degrades in about 1 million years. Dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. There's no recoverable dinosaur DNA. Jurassic Park is impossible science fiction (for now).
2. How much does it cost to resurrect a species?
Varies enormously: from $1 million (recent species, good DNA) to $100+ million (ancient species, degraded DNA). The mammoth is costing about $15 million so far.
3. Will the resurrected animal be 100% identical to the original?
No. It will be a hybrid or "proxy" - genetically very similar, but not identical. Think 95-99% the same. Learned behaviors (not genetic) will be different.
4. Where would we put these animals?
Special reserves, conservation parks, or reintroduction to natural habitat (if it still exists). Mammoths would go to "Pleistocene Park" in Siberia. Thylacines would return to Tasmania.
5. Isn't this "playing God"?
Complex philosophical argument. Counter-argument: humans caused these extinctions, so we have a moral responsibility to correct them. Besides, we already "play God" with agriculture, medicine, domestication.
6. What if the resurrected animal suffers?
Valid concern. Strict ethical protocols are necessary. The animal must have quality of life, adequate habitat, and not be treated as a perpetual experiment.
7. Doesn't this divert resources from living endangered species?
Common criticism. Ideally, we do both - save living species AND resurrect extinct ones. De-extinction technologies (CRISPR, cloning) also help living species.
8. When will we see the first resurrected extinct animal?
Tasmanian tiger and mammoth are predicted for 2027-2030. Others may take decades. Some will never be possible (DNA too degraded).
Conclusion
Extinction is no longer forever. For the first time, humanity has the power to reverse extinctions. In 10-20 years, we may see mammoths walking in Siberia, thylacines in Tasmania, and perhaps passenger pigeons flying again.
But with great power comes great responsibility. De-extinction raises profound questions about our relationship with nature.
Key lessons:
- Science can reverse extinction - but we shouldn't depend on it
- Prevention is always better - saving living species must be the priority
- Ethics must guide technology - just because we can, doesn't mean we should
- We are guardians of biodiversity - not owners, but responsible
The future of biodiversity is in our hands - literally. Let's use them wisely. 🦣🐅🌍
Read also: